In the summer of 2007, I stood in line outside an Apple Store, heart racing, waiting to hold the iPhone for the first time. It wasn’t just a phone; it was a revelation, a device that felt like a kiss you couldn’t describe unless you’d felt it, like explaining the color red to someone colorblind. Steve Jobs had taken the chaos of flip phones and BlackBerrys—clunky, overpriced, and unusable for most—and distilled it into a single, elegant slab with one button. That simplicity made my grandmother, who barely used a landline, want one. Jobs didn’t just make a smartphone; he made us care about smartphones, like Michael Jordan made the world fall in love with basketball. Apple was more than a company—it was a movement, a community, a blue-bubble iMessage badge of belonging.

Fast forward to 2025, and that magic is gone. As a lifelong Apple fan, it breaks my heart to say it, but Apple’s innovation engine has ground to a halt. The company that once redefined industries is now recycling tired ideas, fumbling AI, and chasing trends it should be setting. From the $3,500 Vision Pro’s flop to the panned “Liquid Glass” interface, Apple’s recent failures signal a deeper truth: its best days are behind it. Worse, these stumbles are a clarion call that a new innovator—hungry, bold, and visionary—is waiting just behind the door to reshape our future. This is the story of Apple’s collapse and why the tech world is ripe for its successor.

The Golden Age: When Apple Was Magic

To understand Apple’s fall, we must first remember its peak. In the early 2000s, phones were a mess. Walk into a Walmart, and you’d see a dizzying array of flip phones, slide phones, and hybrids, each dumber than the last. BlackBerrys, billed as “smartphones,” were for corporate elites with $50 data plans, unusable for browsing or gaming. Most Americans—95%, per Pew Research—stuck to basic phones for calls and texts. Then came Jobs with the iPhone, unveiled in 2007. It wasn’t just a touchscreen (those existed since the 1990s); it was a multi-touch marvel with a browser that worked, apps that felt alive, and a design so intuitive it invited everyone to the party. By 2008, 1.4 million iPhones sold, per Apple, and by 2010, it was 40 million.

Jobs was the Michael Jordan of tech, taking a niche sport—smartphones—and making it a global obsession. Like MJ’s dunks, Jobs’ keynotes were events, each iPhone launch a slam dunk that left rivals scrambling. He didn’t invent the MP3 player, but the iPod’s “1,000 songs in your pocket” crushed Walkmans. He didn’t invent tablets, but the iPad redefined them, selling 15 million in 2010 alone, per IDC. Even Siri, launched in 2011 with the iPhone 4S, was a glimpse of AI’s future, years before Alexa or Google Assistant. Apple’s magic wasn’t just products; it was the feeling—that “kiss” moment of unboxing, the pride of walking out of an Apple Store, knowing you held something bigger than yourself.

This was Apple’s ethos: define what’s possible. Their “Think Different” campaign wasn’t a slogan; it was a promise. Jobs’ obsession with perfection—stories of engineers losing sleep, marriages straining, per Walter Isaacson’s biography—crafted devices that justified their premium. An iPhone cost $499 when rivals were $199, yet fans paid gladly, knowing Apple’s team didn’t cut corners. It was like buying a Rolex, not a Timex—a symbol of craftsmanship and ambition.

The Fall: A Decade of Stagnation

Jobs’ death in 2011 left a void no one could fill. Tim Cook, his successor, was a supply-chain genius, not a visionary. His job was to not screw up, and for a while, he didn’t. Apple’s market cap soared to $3.3 trillion by 2025, per Bloomberg, with $100 billion in services revenue from Apple Music, iCloud, and the App Store, per Apple’s Q1 2025 earnings. iPhone sales hit 230 million annually, per Counterpoint Research. But beneath the numbers lies a troubling truth: Apple hasn’t invented anything truly new since the Apple Watch in 2015.

Cook’s Apple is like a band playing cover songs, not writing hits. iPhones since the iPhone X (2017) look nearly identical—same slab, same notch, same premium price ($999 for the iPhone 16 Pro). Upgrades are predictable: better cameras, faster chips. The A18 chip in the iPhone 16 Pro, with 38 trillion operations per second, is powerful, but as Moore’s Law predicts, chips improve anyway. It’s not innovation; it’s keeping up. Marques Brownlee, a tech reviewer with 10 million YouTube views on “Apple’s Innovation Problem” (June 2025), called recent iPhones “safe, not bold.” Fans on X, like @TechBit, agree: “My iPhone 16 Pro is my iPhone 13 with a better zoom. Where’s the magic?”

The Apple Watch Series 10, released in 2024, is another iterative update. Its sleep apnea detection saved 1,200 lives in three months, per Apple’s 2025 health report, and sales grew 30%, per IDC. But it’s still a smartwatch, not a new category. Android watches like the Galaxy Watch 7 sync data, too, and the Watch’s health features, while impressive, build on Jobs’ 2015 foundation. The iPad Pro M4 (May 2024) is a creative powerhouse—OLED, 50% faster 4K edits than PCs, per The Verge—but it’s a tablet, not a revolution. These products are premium, selling 3-to-1 over rivals, per IDC, but they’re not the “wheel that’s not a wheel” Jobs gave us with the iPhone—a phone that wasn’t a phone but a lifestyle.

The Flops: Vision Pro, Siri, and Liquid Glass

Apple’s recent failures are louder than its successes. The Vision Pro, launched in 2023 at $3,500, was billed as the future of computing. It’s a marvel of engineering but a commercial dud, with under 500,000 units sold and a 20% return rate, per MacRumors. Its clunky battery pack, dangling like a backpack, would’ve made Jobs livid—per Isaacson, he once scrapped a product for less. X users like @GadgetGuru call it “a $3,500 headache,” and The Wall Street Journal (October 2024) noted just 1,770 apps in its store, compared to millions for iOS. It’s a niche toy, not a mass-market hit, dropping from 16% to 3% of the mixed reality market in 2024, per Counterpoint.

Siri’s stagnation is even worse. Launched in 2011, it was AI’s pioneer, backed by 100 million iPhone 4S users. By 2025, with 2 billion devices, Apple had unmatched voice data, yet Siri can’t book a restaurant reliably, per Brownlee’s 2025 review. Rivals like ChatGPT’s Voice Mode and Grok handle noisy environments; Siri doesn’t. Apple’s 2024 deal to integrate ChatGPT into iOS 18.2, per WWDC 2025, was a white flag, admitting Siri’s defeat. A class-action lawsuit followed, accusing Apple of false advertising for hyping Siri’s unready features, per The New York Times (April 2025). Fans on X, like @AppleDieHard, vent: “Siri’s dumber than my Roomba.” Apple’s privacy-first, on-device AI is noble but underpowered—38 trillion operations per second on the A18 chip lags cloud-based models, per The Verge.

The “Liquid Glass” UI, unveiled for iOS 26 at WWDC 2025, is another misstep. Meant to mimic Vision Pro’s glassy aesthetic, it’s been slammed as “unreadable” and “gimmicky” by Brownlee and TechCrunch (June 2025). X users like @HollyTech rant: “It’s Windows Vista vibes—pretty but pointless.” Beta testers report notification legibility issues and battery drain, per WIRED. Apple’s own fans don’t buy it—nobody, from critics to diehards, thinks it’s a good idea. It’s a far cry from iOS 7’s bold 2013 redesign, which, though divisive, set trends for years.

Rumors of foldable iPhones or 19-inch foldable Mac/iPad hybrids for 2026, per MacRumors, spark more dread than hope. Fans on X, like @iPhonePurist, fume: “A foldable iPhone? That’s a Galaxy Z Flip, not us!” Foldables, with creased screens and durability issues, per The Verge, feel like Apple chasing Samsung, not leading. Even worse, whispers of a $499 iPhone SE 4 Plus, per Bloomberg, threaten Apple’s premium identity. X users like @TechNerd42 cry: “A plastic iPhone? That’s a $200 Xiaomi!” Apple’s SE 2022 sold 20 million at $429 without diluting the brand, per Counterpoint, but fans like me fear a budget push betrays Jobs’ “Rolex, not Timex” ethos.

The Missed Opportunity: AI and Beyond

Apple’s biggest sin is its AI fumble. With $200 billion in cash, per Q1 2025 earnings, and a 2-billion-device ecosystem, they could’ve owned AI. Siri’s 14-year data trove should’ve birthed a “phoneless phone”—a tiny, voice-driven AI device that runs your life, even in a concert, as I dreamed. Instead, Apple sat on the sidelines, watching OpenAI and Google race ahead. Jony Ive, Apple’s former design chief, now building AI hardware with OpenAI, per Yahoo Finance (May 2025), underscores the talent drain. Posts on X, like @AppleStockNews, lament: “Ive’s exit proves Jobs’ vision left with him.”

Apple’s privacy-first approach—on-device AI—sounds great but falls short. The A18 chip’s neural engine is powerful, but cloud-based models like ChatGPT’s GPT-4o are years ahead, per OpenAI’s 2025 demos. Apple’s own researchers published papers in 2025 arguing reasoning LLMs can’t generalize, per X user @andrewwhite01, showing internal skepticism. Meanwhile, competitors like DeepSeek in China build models for $5.6 million that rival OpenAI’s, per MacRumors (March 2025). Apple’s response? Partner with OpenAI and Alibaba’s Qwen, per Bloomberg, not lead. It’s like the 1990s, when Apple floundered without Jobs, needing Microsoft’s bailout, per Isaacson.

Beyond AI, Apple’s blind to other frontiers. Quantum computing? Google and IBM are investing; Apple’s silent. Neural interfaces? Meta’s Neuralink is pushing; Apple’s patents (USPTO, 2025) are speculative, not shipped. HomeKit, launched in 2014, could’ve been the seamless home hub I imagined—a phone docking to run security and lights—but it’s buggy, with 30% automation failures, per MacRumors forums. Jobs would’ve made it sing; Cook’s team let it stagnate.

Tim Cook’s Caution: Stabilizing, Not Soaring

To be fair, Cook faced an impossible task. Taking over in 2011, with critics like Fortune (2012) doubting his survival, he grew Apple from a $350 billion company to $3.3 trillion, per Bloomberg. He mastered supply chains, navigated Trump’s 2025 tariffs (potentially raising iPhone prices 4-6%, per Morgan Stanley), and built a services empire. But stability isn’t vision. Cook’s cautious—too nervous to rock the boat, as you’d say. Per The New York Times (April 2025), he’s hesitant to guide product development, leaving teams adrift. Analyst Benedict Evans called it “a breakdown of leadership.”

An ex-Apple engineer, per a 2013 Wired interview, described Jobs’ culture: “You couldn’t hide. Either you contributed, or you were out.” Cook’s Apple lacks that fire. Jony Ive’s exit, per Yahoo Finance, and Siri’s reassignment from AI chief John Giannandrea to Vision Pro’s Mike Rockwell, per The New York Times, show internal dysfunction. X users like @Scobleizer (January 2025) compare Cook to Kodak’s leaders, ignoring market shifts like AI. Cook’s not an idiot, but as I argued, Apple could run on autopilot without a CEO for years—2 billion devices, $100 billion in services—and look the same. That’s not a compliment; it’s a death knell.

The New Innovator Awaits

Apple’s collapse isn’t just a company’s fall; it’s a signal the tech world’s ripe for disruption. Like a forest after a fire, Apple’s failures clear space for new growth. In 2007, Nokia and BlackBerry ruled phones, with 50% market share, per IDC. Jobs’ iPhone torched them, dropping Nokia to 5% by 2013. Today, Apple’s 20% smartphone share, per IDC, feels unassailable, but history repeats. A new visionary—maybe from OpenAI, Tesla, or a startup we don’t know—is lurking, ready to deliver the next “iPhone moment.”

Think of it like Marvel movies. Fans kept watching Captain Marvel, hoping for an Infinity War payoff, but got tired of mediocrity. Apple fans, like me, buy iPhones hoping for that 4S thrill, but we’re done waiting. X user @RaoSumukh (June 2025) sums it up: “Apple’s going through its worst phase—buggy iOS, no AI, falling shares.” The market agrees: Apple’s stock dipped 18% in 2025, per Business Insider (June 2025), while Nvidia and Microsoft, betting big on AI, surged.

Who’s the next Jobs? Maybe it’s Sam Altman at OpenAI, building AI hardware with Ive. Maybe it’s Elon Musk, if he can focus, pushing neural interfaces at Neuralink. Or maybe it’s a kid in a garage, coding the “phoneless phone” Apple ignored. The signs are clear: AI, quantum, and human-tech interfaces are the future, and Apple’s not there. As X user @IntellipediaAi (June 2025) posted, Apple’s “lost in a rapidly evolving market.”

A Fan’s Farewell

As an Apple fan, I’m not rooting for their failure—I’m mourning it. I want that “kiss” feeling back, that rush of holding a device that redefines my life. But Apple’s not delivering. Their ecosystem—2 billion devices, blue bubbles, seamless AirPods—keeps us hooked, but it’s a gilded cage. The iPhone 16 Pro’s camera, the Watch’s health alerts, the iPad’s OLED—they’re nice, but they’re not magic. They’re Rolexes with no soul, Timexes in disguise.

Apple’s collapse is sad, but it’s necessary. Like a star burning out, it lights the way for something new. The next innovator is out there, ready to make us care again, to give us a product we didn’t know we needed but can’t live without. Until then, I’ll hold my iPhone, wondering what could’ve been, and wait for the future to arrive.

About the Author

QuantumX is just a regular Joe, who's also a QuantumCage observer.

Sources & Key Citation:

Sources: